US Environmental Groups Call for Ban on PFAss Chemicals


A coalition of US environmental groups have told Congress that new per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) should be banned and are calling for a halt on continued use of existing ones.

The latest push to eliminate and ban the controversial substances came in a meeting of the House of Representatives’ Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing, “Perfluorinated chemicals in the environment: An update on the response to contamination and challenges presented.,”

The bulk of the committee’s discussion focused on setting enforceable and sufficiently protective drinking water standards, especially in light of recent PFAS contamination events in some U.S. states including New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Colorado.

However, restricting the substances’ manufacture and use also was also discussed as a potential method for controlling their presence in the environment.

PFASs: the new PCBs? 

In oral testimony and written comments submitted to the House subcommittee on the environment, the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Eric Olson said that the EPA should use TSCA to ban new uses of existing PFASs, as well as all new PFASs.

Olson also called for a phase-out of all existing uses, calling for “extremely narrow exceptions for true national defense needs, emergencies, or similar urgent needs where there are no safer alternatives.”

“The evidence has become clear that PFASs are our new PCBs [polychlorinated biphenyls] – but are possibly more widespread and dangerous,” he said. The EPA “must step up to fix the problem now Olson said.

In addition, he submitted a letter endorsed by more than 50 organizations, echoing the call to move away from the full class of substances.

“States are already stepping up to eliminate PFAS from key product sectors, including food packaging firefighting foam and textiles,” wrote the groups, which included Earthjustice, Safer States and the Environmental Working Group (EWG). “Congress should phase out the use of these chemicals to avoid further contamination.”

The American Chemistry Council, however, issued a statement saying that PFASs currently manufactured “have been well studied and undergone rigorous regulatory review,” the trade group asserted. Adding that the review was performed under the TSCA new chemicals program.

ACC said the chemicals “play an essential role in many products we depend on in modern life.,”

The ACC said it supports the determination of maximum environmental contaminant levels grounded in “sound science”. It pledged to continue being a “constructive partner to state and federal regulators and other stakeholders affected by this important issue”.

PFAS controversy

The public hearing comes amid a spike in consumer concern and political controversy surrounding the class of substances.

Even though the EPA has rolled out a PFAS action plan and held community engagement events, lawmakers expressed concern that the agency has lost the public’s confidence amid reports that it worked to suppress the release of a PFAS toxicity profile for fear of a “public relations nightmare.”

Others questioned whether the agency’s proposed ‘science transparency’ policy could undercut critical studies on the substances.

Recently several bills have been introduced to address PFAS contamination in the environment, most of which have been introduced at the state and municipal level to bypass federal inaction.

About Jack Schatz

Jack Schatz began writing about Proposition 65 and other U.S. environmental laws since 1994. He has also written extensively about Consumer Product safety as well. He is the publisher and co-author of the 2013 and 2017 editions of the Proposition 65 Handbook.
Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Login to your account below

Fill the forms bellow to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.