Appellate Court Stays Penalty Phase of Starbucks Trial

Array

492
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS

 

A California appeals court has stayed the Penalties Phase of the Starbucks Coffee Trial that had been set to determine penalties in the Proposition 65 case against Starbucks and nearly 75 additional coffee roasters.

The defense argued that the trial should be delayed pending the outcome of a regulatory action initiated by the State’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) in June.   The regulation if adopted would amend the warning regulation to state that brewed coffee poses No significant risk of cancer, which would relieve the coffee roasters from any duty to provide Proposition 65 warnings.

The trial court judge had denied the request for a stay last month, maintaining that a stay was not justified based on a “hypothetical regulation.”

Regardless, OEHHA’s “hypothetical regulation” continues to move forward despite the sidelined trial judge’s antipathy toward the agency’s proposed regulation.

The Center for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT), the plaintiff in the action filed a lawsuit against OEHHA in Los Angeles Superior Court enjoin the agency from moving forward with its proposed regulation.

Public comments on the proposed rule were submitted by August 30, 2018.  The court has asked the defense to provide a written status update to the court by January 15, 2019.

About Jack Schatz

Jack Schatz began writing about Proposition 65 and other U.S. environmental laws since 1994. He has also written extensively about Consumer Product safety as well. He is the publisher and co-author of the 2013 and 2017 editions of the Proposition 65 Handbook.
Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Login to your account below

Fill the forms bellow to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.